Sunday, 17 February 2019

Managing and Evaluating Reference Services


From the beginning of this course, I have been looking at the reference section in our library.  Is it functional? Is it up to date? Are students using it? What is its purpose? What needs to be weeded? Why do we have a reference section in elementary?  Are there better resources? The list of questions seems to go on and on.

As much of the information over the past few weeks shared has been connected to policy and various guidelines some of which are directly connected to British Columbia, I decided that I needed to dig further into my Alberta Education curriculum to see what I could find relating to Learning Commons and reference services and materials.  

Alberta however is going through some major transitions right now.  We are on the horizon of adopting a new K-4 curriculum for optional implementation in September 2019, but our Alberta Education website is also slowing moving over to a different web format so resources can also be difficult to locate.  

I was able to come across this Learning Commons Policy and Guidelines.  I found the policy and guidelines very interesting as some aspects were directly related to the importance of reference sources and services.  Most notably ensuring students have access to quality resources in both digital and print to address all student learning needs (Alberta Education, 2014).

Learning Commons Policy and Guidelines

To meet and address the student learning needs, the Library Learning Commons must have the materials available to meet the curious and intrigued minds of our students.  Our advances in society are made through the curiosity of individuals. The library can provide that starting point for our students to seek out information, answer their inquiry questions and challenge their thinking.  From much of the reading through this theme, a recurring thought came through for me and that was the importance of relationships.



The teacher librarian must develop effective relationships with all stakeholders.  Reidling, Shake and Houston (2013) share about the importance of reference interviews and how the “reference interview still involves human relations, communications and interaction with the student” (p. 105).  If we as teacher librarians do not have those relationships with students they will not feel comfortable approaching us with their questions for research projects or reader’s advisory. The same is true for the educators we work with.  Building those relationships with our colleagues is key to the success of the Library Learning Commons.

I found the role of the teacher librarian information in module 6 very interesting as my school district does not have a job description currently for teacher librarians.  As my school is the only one currently with a teacher librarian role we are currently creating this job description. I look forward to sharing this with my current administration. My administration has been very involved in learning more about Library Learning Commons and how to effectively support all students in our school to provide equal access. After last year’s creation of a Library Learning Commons Leadership Committee, my administration decided to put a greater focus on budget allocations.  My administration even put budget lines in for fiction and non-fiction. Again this is where relationships is so key in managing and evaluating reference sources and materials. The more involved you can get your administration in the Library Learning Commons, the more they will understand the need for certain resources or also the cost in attaining some resources.  Open communication and sharing of information about the Library Learning Commons is key.

After working through Assignment 1, I realized how much more work is required in our Library Learning Commons.  Since I started my position in September, I have worked hard to continually weed the collection mostly just based on age alone.  I have also spent a tremendous amount of time with our First Nations, Metis and Inuit consultant reviewing our resources in this area to ensure appropriate information.  As my school gets closer to moving into our new location, I know more time will have to be devoted to collection development as we will be focused on what needs to be weeded as well as what will need to be purchased in our new location.  

Finally, when evaluating reference services, I feel the biggest challenge or hurdle to overcome in my building right now is the continuation of building relationships.  There are many teachers in my building who are utilizing the services I can provide such as working with students on information literacy, how to access our digital resources, how to find resources in our library though using the OPAC system. Teachers are also feeling more comfortable with asking me to pull resources based on what they are currently teaching.  However, I still have teachers in the building who have not accessed any services that I can provide. I know this is an area I need to continue to work on and look forward to talking with my administration on how we can evaluate the success of whether having a teacher librarian this school year enhanced the Library Learning Commons.



References

Learning Commons Policy and Guidelines. (2014). Retrieved from https://education.alberta.ca/learning-commons/learning-commons/

Riedling, A., Shake, L., & Houston, C. (2013). Reference skills for the school librarian(3rd ed.). Santa Barbara, California: Linworth, an imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC.

Sunday, 3 February 2019

Evaluation of Reference Work in Library Learning Commons


“The library learning commons is the physical and virtual collaborative learning hub of the school” (Canada Library Association, 2014, p.5).  For the success of this learning hub, it is imperative students, educators and parents know the resources/materials within this space have been specifically curated to take into consideration the audience, format and usage of each resource.  Students, educators and parents rely on the resources and services available in the Library Learning Commons. They trust the resources have been properly vetted. According to Elk Island Public School’s Administrative Procedure 250 (2016), the Learning Commons must ensure it maintains an up to date collection with appropriate library selections.


As part of ensuring our library collection in up to date with appropriate library selections, the following checklist can be used to evaluate our collection. After reviewing a resource from our collection, I will share some possible alternatives to be considered for replacement in our Library Learning Commons as we begin the process of ensuring our resources are properly updated and maintained.



The checklist has been created using ideas from Reference Skills for the School Librarian by Ann Marlow Riedling, discussions from colleagues, course work as well as standards set forth in EIPS Administrative Procedure 250. The indicators listed in the checklist will be used to help determine the appropriate selection and weeding of Atlas reference materials.  




The majority of materials in our reference section are atlases.  According to Riedling (2103), “geographical requests can vary widely, requiring and assortment of geography related sources” (p. 79). However, upon further review, many of our atlases were very similar in content. We currently hold 5 Atlases in our collection considered World Atlases.  Our current collection of atlases range in publication dates from 1998-2009. Although Riedling (2013), suggests age may not be the main criterion when weeding resources, it does need to be mentioned a “five-year-old atlas is considered historical” (p. 80).  This would mean every Atlas we currently hold in our collection would be out of date.



PART 1:
The resource I am choosing to evaluate based on the Reference Resource Checklist is The Eyewitness Atlas of the World (1998).





Relevancy and Use of Library Space
  • Is the resource relevant and reliable to the students in our school? NO
  • Does the resource take up an appropriate amount of space on our shelves? YES 
  • Is the resource user friendly, allow access to information quickly and provides many different access points for students based on grade level and reading ability? YES & NO
  • Is the format of the resource easy to understand with a comprehensive how to use introduction?  YES


This current resource is only 160 pages so it takes up little space in our Learning Commons.  The format and introduction of the resource provides an adequate Key as well as a comprehensive section on how to use the atlas.  However, the relevancy and reliability of this resource in questionable due to the some of the content easily observed. This resource still has Pluto listed as a planet and it does not show the territory of Nunavut.  Although students are able to access information quickly the reading ability would definitely be suited for Division 2 students (Gr. 4-6).




Purpose and Curricular Connections
  • Does the resource meet the needs and follow the Alberta Program of Studies? NO
  • Is the resource circulated appropriately within the school so it can meet student needs and support their inquiring minds? NO
  • Does this resource meet and support the EIPS Administrative Procedure 250? NO
  • Does this resource add value to student learning and introduce the students to the social context of the world they live in? NO
According to Section 1.3 of EIPS Administrative Procedure the Principal shall: provide students with information about Canadian society, its many facets and the contributions of multicultural groups to Canadian social, political, economic and creative life.


This atlas unfortunately does not meet this descriptor as it uses the term Eskimos which we know to be an inappropriate term when referring to our Inuit population.  


Due to the age of this resource students may not be able to use this resource for reporting accurate information on communities.  For example: The Canadian population in this resources is listed as 27 800 000. According to Statistics Canada (2016) the Canadian population was just over 35 million.





Additionally, when reviewing the circulation history of this resource it has only been circulated 10 times since its acquisition in 2000.  The last time it was circulated was January 2013.


Currency/Authority
  • Is this resource up to date as we live in an ever changing world? NO
  • Does this resource provide our students with accurate and current ideas with multiple opinions? NO
  • Is the cost of the resource taken into consideration with its usage? N/A
  • Has a reputable publisher published the material? YES


This resource was published by a reputable publisher - Dorling Kindersley.  The biggest downfall of this resource is its age. This resource is 21 years old which makes for many inaccuracies which do not accurately represent our current world landscape.  


Although this resource could be used as a historical atlas to compare and contrast with a newer version, I would suggest weeding this from the collection.



PART 2:
The newest atlas to evaluate based on the checklist which I could currently find is the Smithsonian Children’s Illustrated Atlas (2016) which I will choose to evaluate based on the checklist.





Relevancy and Use of Library Space
  • Is the resource relevant and reliable to the students in our school? YES
  • Does the resource take up an appropriate amount of space on our shelves? YES 
  • Is the resource user friendly, allow access to information quickly and provides many different access points for students based on grade level and reading ability? YES
  • Is the format of the resource easy to understand with a comprehensive how to use introduction?  YES

Purpose and Curricular Connections
  • Does the resource meet the needs and follow the Alberta Program of Studies? YES & NO
  • Is the resource circulated appropriately within the school so it can meet student needs and support their inquiring minds? N/A
  • Does this resource meet and support the EIPS Administrative Procedure 250? YES
  • Does this resource add value to student learning and introduce the students to the social context of the world they live in? YES
Currency/Authority
  • Is this resource up to date as we live in an ever changing world? YES
  • Does this resource provide our students with accurate and current ideas with multiple opinions? YES
  • Is the cost of the resource taken into consideration with its usage? YES
  • Has a reputable publisher published the material? YES



Although this resource met most of the criteria on the Reference Resource Checklist, I wish to point out a few things to keep into consideration.  This resource is a very simplistic atlas. It has a ‘key’ which highlights the produce and industry in Canada but is very limited in the information it provides on Canadian content to meet the curricular content in the Alberta Program of Studies.  However, the images, graphics and layout are very appealing in this atlas and I could see many students of all ages and grade levels choosing to look through this resource. This resource would definetly be a great introduction to atlases at the younger grade levels, but lacks some of the more detailed content required for older grades. This resource is currently only 2 years old and is also published from Dorling Kindersley.  It is 128 pages with a price tag of $18.45. I would recommend this resource be added to the collection.


Riedling (2013) suggests National Geographic Atlases as suitable for school libraries.  While searching which resources National Geographic might have available for the school market, I came across 3 resources we may consider purchasing for the Library Learning Commons.  All three of these resources have publication dates in 2019. Limited information is currently available on these resources but they are all strong possibilities to be added to our collection.  The National Geographic website does not even have information listed at this time regarding these upcoming publications. This information was retrieved from Amazon.


The first is the National Geographic Beginner's World Atlas which will be available July 9, 2019.  The cover itself is appealing to the eye and the cost of the hardcover version is only $21.14 CAN with 64 pages.  The synopsis on Amazon talks about lively photos and a kid-friendly design.


The second is the National Geographic Student World Atlas which will also be available July 9, 2019.  This is the Fifth Edition and according to Amazon it is complete with updated maps and statistics. The cost of the hardcover version is only $22.90 CAN and 144 pages.  


Finally, the National Geographic Atlas of the World, 11th Edition will be available September 3, 2019.  According to Amazon this is National Geographic's Flagship Atlas, but with this designation also comes the heftier price tag at $243.85 with 448 pages.  


Once these three resources are available for purchase and more information is available, the Library Learning Commons Leadership Team will spend some time reviewing our Reference Resource Checklist to determine which to purchase.  


References

Administrative Procedures. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.eips.ca/about-us/administrative-procedures/250

Brooks, A. (2016). Children's illustrated atlas. New York: DK Publishing.

Canadian School Libraries (CSL). (2018).  Leading Learning:  Standards of Practice for School Library Learning Commons in Canada.  Retrieved from http://llsop.canadianschoollibraries.ca


Raincoast Books. (1998). Eyewitness atlas of the world. Vancouver.

Riedling, A., Shake, L., & Houston, C. (2013). Reference skills for the school librarian(3rd ed.). Santa Barbara, California: Linworth, an imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC.